First, I had a pre-op mammogram today (my first ever, and what a bizarre thing a mammo is, too). Results were all clear on both sides: no masses, no calcifications. ("Calcification" is the build-up of calcium in the breast tissue and may indicate early signs of cancerous growth. They are usually small specks, like grains of sand, and can't be detected by clinical exam. But I don't have any, so we don't have to worry!)
Second, and even more thrilling, was my Tuesday pre-op appointment with my surgeon, Dr. Tartter. The meeting was initially scheduled to be my post-op appt, back before we knew that I would need more surgery. Dr. Tartter has been on vacation since the week after my first lumpectomy, and even though I've made fast friends with Wendy, the Physician's Assistant, this was my first time speaking with Dr. Tartter since the diagnosis. I was terrified that he would give me even more bad news, that maybe Wendy had tried to go easy on me. On the contrary, Dr. Tartter was very encouraging in his reading and explaining of the pathology report. Here are the highlights:
- Whereas the path report states that I have 3 positive margins (that is, cancer cells at or near the edges of the mass that was removed), Dr. Tartter explained that I actually only have one small area that is close. A tumor, when removed, is marked as if it is a cube or box: with 6 flat sides coming together at right angles. Of course, in reality it can be shaped very differently, with rounded edges, uneven sides and angles, and so forth. My positive margins happened to be at the "intersection" of 3 of those flat sides - like on the point of a cube. So, technically, it is 3 margins, but in practical terms, there is only one spot where the doctor will go back for a bit more tissue.
- My positive margins were the best kind of positive, which is to say "not very." A "clean" or "negative" margin is generally considered to be one with 2 mm of normal breast tissue between the cancer cells and the outside edge of the mass. My margin was between 1 and 2 mm - what they sometimes call a "dirty" margin. Dr. Tartter said that he normally would not even go back for one such margin, but since we need to do the sentinel node biopsy anway, he'll take out more tissue there as "insurance" (his word).
- Dr. Tartter said I should disregard studies that conclude that younger women diagnosed with breast cancer have a lower survival rate and/or a worse prognosis than older women with the same disease. He recently published a paper on that topic, parsing the literature, and concluded that the difference is not statistically significant.
8 comments:
This is my very first blog posting, and I can't think of a more important occasion for it. I just hope I'm posting my electronic hugs to Sara in the right place. She's been so amazing throughout this whole scary process -- strong, honest, hopeful, determined. I hope she knows how much we're all behind her. And I promise to buy her some kickin' scarves for the chemo phase, distract her whenever she needs it, and be available for babysitting at all hours of the day or night.
It sounds like the appointments went great - we could not be happier!! Give me a buzz if you want to, otherwise we'll just be sending you good vibes Monday morning.
Glad to hear you finally got some good news to help lift your spirits! For now virtual hugs will have to suffice until some physical hugs can happen.. =)
If there's anything Corinna or I can do to help, don't hesitate to ask!
hurray!! :)
and welcome to the "blogosphere." Sean hates that word and has, up until recently, been actively campaiging against the word "blog" and all of its modifications. he gave up though. the tide was against him. it's definitely one of the ugliest words i can think of. i also think "bra" is a really ugly word too. maybe anything too much like "blah" is just ugly.
Good news is always welcome! And welcome to the blogworld, all sorts of people out here, I've made good friends via the net (and IRL as well)
Sean, I don't think we should give up the good fight! But what is the alternative to "blog"? Just "web log"? That's not really much better...
whew! I am sooooo glad to get this news!
my two cents on 'blog' - it's definitely too late to turn the tide on usage, but what the hey-ho does 'web log' mean anyway - a log is a list of data, no? poorly coined, in my opinion. I like journal - i.e., a series of writings - and as a bonus it's an ex-medium term at this point! the interactive aspect that's added by the comments function is rather non-journal-y, but it's still not a 'log'. oh well. :)
Ragan told me the news. But, sounds like the news is getting better. Please let me know if we can help. We'll come by for a visit soon. Maybe play some Apples to Apples!
Jennifer, Ian and Esme
Post a Comment